| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 |
581. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cypermethren wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: Mallikanth wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: ... I mean evidence of coordinated wrongdoing. CCP Sreegs, what do you mean by "coordinated "? It gives me the impression that because you need other people...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.30 11:24:00
|
582. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Homo Erectus wrote: f the coordinated wrong and the definition rewrite. how about a 30 byte addendum to the eula with something to the effect of "we reserve to smack the **** out of groups who condone or look the other way concerning botting". ...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.29 18:43:00
|
583. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallikanth wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: ... I mean evidence of coordinated wrongdoing. CCP Sreegs, what do you mean by "coordinated "? It gives me the impression that because you need other people to coordinate anything then any evidence of...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.29 17:50:00
|
584. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Apollo-Moor wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: Not jumping into the heated rhetorical nature of this thread I did see some comments that I'd just like to get a statement on the record about. When making determinations regarding bans for botting the al...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.29 13:43:00
|
585. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not jumping into the heated rhetorical nature of this thread I did see some comments that I'd just like to get a statement on the record about. When making determinations regarding bans for botting the alliance, corporation, political beliefs, gen...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.29 13:04:00
|
586. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Garia666 wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: Garia666 wrote: Here is a free tip never have multiple accounts on 1 email. You can be banned for no apperent reason. So when you have change it asap I'm pretty sure there are threads for conspiracy th...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.29 11:22:00
|
587. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
It's something I'm looking into. I haven't decided how to structure it yet though really so sisi may not be the best example. For instance, does it make more sense to have a sisi up all the time or to hold a kind of contest? For the next x time po...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.27 14:48:00
|
588. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
mazzilliu wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: I just did tell you what's acceptable. :) Don't attack our infrastructure. I understand that's not an optimal answer from a wanting to help perspective, and it's something I'm working to get around, but a...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.27 14:27:00
|
589. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
mazzilliu wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: mazzilliu wrote: Although a 15$ plex isn't a whole lot of incentive to put forth the unknown number of hours necessary to find an undiscovered vulnerability, it is rather fun and there aren't a whole lot...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.27 12:12:00
|
590. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Garia666 wrote: Here is a free tip never have multiple accounts on 1 email. You can be banned for no apperent reason. So when you have change it asap I'm pretty sure there are threads for conspiracy theories or trolling somewhere on this for...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.26 16:29:00
|
591. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
mazzilliu wrote: Internet Knight wrote: Report one significant issue: how much time was invested by the player in researching the exploit? How much time was invested in internal research to verify the exploit? If released publicly, how much ...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.26 16:27:00
|
592. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Internet Knight wrote: Report one significant issue: how much time was invested by the player in researching the exploit? How much time was invested in internal research to verify the exploit? If released publicly, how much damage could have be...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.26 16:26:00
|
593. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
mazzilliu wrote: Although a 15$ plex isn't a whole lot of incentive to put forth the unknown number of hours necessary to find an undiscovered vulnerability, it is rather fun and there aren't a whole lot of opportunities for sanctioned hacking ...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.26 16:23:00
|
594. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Knalldari Testpilot wrote: Asking the EVE community for help in fixing security issues after banning Helicity Bonson for doing exact this could only be some kind of a hilarious troll. You guys have some strange humor... //off topic The ne...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.26 16:20:00
|
595. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
T'Laar Bok wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: incentivizing I cant decide if you got that from The Buzzword Dictionary or The Dictionary of Corporate Bullsh!t. Both available on Amazon if anyone is interested. It means to give incentive. ...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.23 11:45:00
|
596. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Yeah sorry dude, but framing a question in such a way that there's no good, or even honest answer isn't really going to get you the rosiest of replies on my best day. :) The answer is that yes we did determine how we could improve the process and...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.22 23:21:00
|
597. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
MailDeadDrop wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: All code that is written is peer reviewed and subject to rounds of internal testing. Prior to publication of the code, a reputable third party performs a vulnerability analysis of the codebase that will ...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.22 23:03:00
|
598. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Florestan Bronstein wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: Filing a bug report - This suffers from a similar malady to the first. A lot of information comes into both of these systems and we wouldn't be doing anyone a service by spending our days weeding ...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.22 12:09:00
|
599. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Florestan Bronstein wrote: CCP Sreegs wrote: Posting on the forums about it - This is also a bad idea. A really really bad idea as it is essentially an open disclosure, which leaves the system vulnerable to exploitation via the detailed meth...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.22 12:07:00
|
600. Sticky:New dev blog: Responsible Disclosure - Reporting Security Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
darmwand wrote: Quote: That's pretty much essentially what we'd consider enabling, but as you so eloquently pointed out there are significant moving parts that need to be coordinated in order for that to happen, which is why I haven't firmly...
- by CCP Sreegs - at 2011.09.21 23:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |